Surin S.Yu.
Brief denial of universality
Special theory of relativity (SRT)
So,
I deduce from the SRT postulates - the equality of IFR (inertial frames of
reference) and the constancy of the speed of light (C = const) in them - an
irreparable contradiction. Which refutes the universality of SRT, but,
paradoxically, does not cancel experiments consistent with it. It's all about
interpreting time as a way to synchronize clocks.
The
results of the experiments will depend on the language game (see my work
"Metaphysics of the Authentic"
https://archive.org/details/MetaphysicsReliable), in which one or another
interpretation of the "playing self" - the way of interpreting the
"time" index, will be implemented.
Here
are two clocks located at a distance L from each other, at rest relative to
their IFR.
The
clock sends a signal in two directions along a straight line connecting them,
with a certain period, blue and red. So that both beams reach the middle of the
distance L between them simultaneously in their frame of reference.
Let
us consider another frame of reference N, moving along the indicated straight
line with some constant speed relative to the clock in their direction.
If
in the N system the clock will work simultaneously, as in the clock reference
system, then first one signal will come to the N sensors, then another with a
time delay t = L1 / c, where L1 is the distance between the clocks, but already
in the moving relative to the clock IFR N, c - speed of light.
Now
show by what means, if this is not the case and the clock did not work
simultaneously in the N system, the delay time will be different.
It
will not be otherwise.
The
clock for moving system (IFR) N will also work simultaneously
Then,
in the clock system, the rays will reach the middle of the distance between
them simultaneously, as was agreed from the very beginning.
And
in a moving IFR N not simultaneously, because the midpoint between the clocks
will move towards one ray and go away from the other and, as we remember, with c
= const in both systems - one signal in the middle between the clocks will come
earlier than the other later.
Now
place the cat in the middle between the clocks and demand that the cat dies if
the rays reach the middle at the same time, and lives if there is even the
slightest mismatch in the observed (!! significant) arrival of the rays to the
middle.
Then
for the IFR of the clock the cat will be dead, and for the moving frame (IFR) N
it will be alive - all according to the SRT, but this cannot be !!!
That's
all for the versatility of special theory of relativity.
Yes,
if you refer to the authority of textbooks, which say that simultaneous events
in ONE place are simultaneous in all IFRs, then I just proved that this is not
so - it all depends on the way the clock is synchronized, it is also the way of
interpreting "time" - the darkest concept in physics. For me, it is
not associated with a physical process or phenomenon (propagation of light in a
vacuum), as in Einstein, but prepared in advance as knowledge (consciousness)
about two hours.
More
details in my article "The second death of Schrödinger's cat or the
paradox of simultaneity in SRT"
Link
to article - https://archive.org/details/20190812_20190812_0738
Although
the article is about deeper things - time and consciousness, the collapse of
the wave function ...
