четверг, 8 февраля 2024 г.

Essence and origins of anti-Semitism

 Essence and origins of anti-Semitism


Nobody wants to look at the essence and origins of anti-Semitism, which is about 2500 years old.

        One of the first theorists of anti-Semitism can be considered the Egyptian priest Manethon , who lived under Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285-246 BC). After his denunciations, the Jews were once again expelled from Egypt.

        The first recorded pogrom of the Jews in Alexandria was in 38 AD.

        The essence of anti-Semitism is in the Torah as a set of archetypes of the collective unconscious of the Jewish people, manifested in the history of relations between Jews and other peoples.

        When the Jews had power, they themselves slaughtered peoples and tribes - the conquest of Canaan.

        The Midianites were completely slaughtered - “and Moses said to them: Why have you left all the women alive? <…> Kill all male children and all women who have known a husband on a man’s bed, kill; and keep all the female children who have not known a man’s bed alive for yourselves” ( Num. 31:15–18 )

        Jerusalem is the city of the Jebusites - where are they? – partly cut out, partly forcibly assimilated.

        When the Jews were out of power, they voluntarily formed financial and cultural ghettos (since the time of their return from Babylonian captivity), covertly and hypocritically hostile to the main population.

            Here is one of the archetypal structures of the Torah .

            Allegedly, in Egyptian slavery, they managed to rob the slave owners who entrusted them (slaves?!) with all their gold (Exodus 12:35-36), to rob them because they had previously saved them from famine (Genesis 47:4).

            At the same time , they were allegedly oppressed so much that out of the 70 people (Exodus 1:5) who came to Egypt after 4 centuries, only 600,000 men (Exodus 12:37) came out ready for battle. Moreover, the slaves ate meat (a luxury at that time) in cauldrons (Exodus 16:3), calling their saviors torturers.

             Another archetypal structure of the Torah.

            Prophet and father, the real creator of the Jews as a people, Moses, after receiving the commandments - “thou shalt not kill,” etc. - directly from God (according to the Torah), yelled at the Jews, then at the whole people.

 - “Why did you leave the children alive?”

“And Moses said to them, Why have you left all the women alive? <…> Kill all male children and all women who have known a husband on a man’s bed, kill; and keep all the female children who have not known a man’s bed alive for yourselves” (Num. 31: 15–18)

           But then the God of the Jews appears . And how does he react to this? Yes, he just doesn’t notice, and does... accounting using the blood of children!!!

"25. And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying:

26. Count the spoils of captivity, from man to beast.”

(Book of Numbers 31:25-27)

             “The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. Who knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together, and what power they can exert through their cohesion .” ( Marcus Tullius Cicero /106-43 BC/ philosopher, Roman politician, orator)

             2000 years have passed since the time of Cicero, and at the end of the 19th century E. Zola writes in his article “In Defense of the Jews” (sic):

            “I will outline the charges against the Jews point by point. They are accused of being a nationality embedded in the depths of other nationalities, that they live the closed life of a religious caste, that for them there are no borders and that they are a kind of international sect, have no real homeland and, if they ever triumph , capable of subjugating the whole world." ( E. Zola expressed the same thing more harshly in the anti-Semitic tirade of one of his characters in the novel “The Financier”).

            And then he sums it up:  "It's all true ."

            But it immediately seems to be justified:

            “ But, having stated this fact, we must explain it. It must be added that the Jews became what they are now as a result of idiotic persecution that lasted eighteen centuries - we ourselves created this type of people .”

             But Cicero and Seneca (also an “anti-Semite”) say exactly the opposite - they were there before these 18 centuries.

            It is unlikely that there was a global thousand-year conspiracy of the peoples of the Earth, different races, cultures, religions, eras, to jointly and purposefully “create this type of people.”

            There must be some core within the Jews themselves that contributed to such a “conspiracy” of peoples and races.

            And this is the core of the archetypes of the Torah, reproduced for centuries by the rabbinate, Talmudists of all categories, and the very way of Jewish life among these peoples.

             So, we read the Torah, Exodus ( Shemot ) chapter 34, and these are not simple words, but God’s command to the entire Jewish people for all times.

 “1. And the Lord said to Moses: Hew out for yourself two tablets of stone, like the first ones, and I will write on these tablets the words that were on the first tablets, which you broke;

 10 And the Lord said: Behold, I make a covenant: before all your people I will do miracles such as have not been done in all the earth or among any people ;......

12 Be careful not to enter into an alliance with the inhabitants of the land into which you enter, lest they become a snare among you.

13 Destroy their altars, break down their pillars, cut down their sacred groves.

 14 For you must not worship any god other than the Lord; because His name is Zealot; He is a jealous God......

 27 And the Lord said to Moses, Write these words to yourself, for in these words I make a covenant with you and with Israel.

28 And Moses stayed there with the Lord forty days and forty nights, eating no bread or drinking water; And he wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the ten chapters ."

             This is their real decalogue (written on the second tablets, and not the first one , the tablets of which Moses broke), and not “Thou shalt not kill,” etc. do not kill your own, but with a stranger who stands on ceremony - destroy and crush their pillars and sacred groves

             The Jews justify this by saying that those nations worshiped idols, for example, Molech.

            But even during the conquest of Canaan and for many centuries after the conquest, the Jews themselves did this, which is reflected by themselves in the Tanakh .

 

“they built high places for Baal in the valley of the sons of Hinnom , to bring their sons and their daughters through the fire in honor of Molech” ( Jer . 32, 35)

 “he desecrated Tophet , which is in the valley of the sons of Hinnom , so that no one would cause his son or his daughter to pass through the fire to Molech” (2 Kings 23:10)

 “Then Solomon built a temple for Chemosh , the abomination of Moab , on the mountain that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of Ammon ” (3 Kings 11:7)

 "21. Do not give any of your children to serve Molech, and do not dishonor the name of your God. I am the Lord." (Leviticus 18:21)


        Hidden contempt for others is expressed in the language of the Jews (a reflection, formed over millennia, of their collective unconscious), in the way Jews treat others, the goyim. As the Jews themselves say, “goyim” are simply different, without any hostile connotation, claiming that there is nothing  wrong with this.

        But let's see how they call the wives and mothers of these others - shiksa (abomination and reptile ).

        "Derived from shikse (from Hebrew שקץ " sheketz " - "abomination, reptile" or "unclean insect") - a Yiddish word meaning a non-Jew and/or a goy , or an insufficiently Orthodox Jew, for example, in terms of standards of behavior ."

        This is what they call our wives, mothers and sisters ( reptiles , insects), this is reflected in their language.

        And language, I repeat once again, is an expression of the collective unconscious, the vocabulary of which cannot be hidden behind empty chatter about tolerance of the always innocently suffering Jewish people.













суббота, 3 февраля 2024 г.

Суть и источник антисемитизма.

              Никто не хочет смотреть в суть и в истоки антисемитизма, которому около 2500 лет.

           Одним из первых теоретиков антисемитизма можно считать египетского жреца Манефона, жившего при Птолемее II Филадельфе (285—246 гг. до н. э.). После его обличений евреев, в очередной раз, изгоняют из Египта.

              Первый зафиксированный погром евреев в Александрии был в 38 году н.э.

              Суть антисемитизма в Торе как совокупности архетипов коллективного бессознательного  еврейского народа, проявленных в истории взаимоотношений евреев с иными народами.

            Когда евреи имели силу, они сами вырезали народы и племена,  - завоевание Ханаана.

            Мадианитяне полностью вырезаны – «и сказал им Моисей: для чего вы оставили в живых всех женщин? <…> Убейте всех детей мужского пола и всех женщин, познавших мужа на мужском ложе, убейте; а всех детей женского пола, которые не познали мужеского ложа, оставьте в живых для себя» (Чис. 31:15-18)

      Иерусалим город иевусеев – а где они? – частично вырезаны, частично насильно ассимилированы.

            Когда евреи  не имели силы, они добровольно образовывали финансовые и культурные гетто (со времён возвращения из вавилонского плена), скрыто и лицемерно враждебные к основному населению.

            Вот одна из архетипических структур Торы.

        Якобы в египетском рабстве умудриться обобрать рабовладельцев, доверившим им (рабам?!) всё своё золото (Исход 12:35-36), обобрать за то, что ранее они спасли их от голода (Бытие 47:4).

            При этом их якобы угнетали так, что из 70 человек (Исход 1:5) пришедших в Египет вышло через 4 века только 600 000 мужчин (Исход 12:37) готовых к бою. Причём рабы ели мясо (роскошь по тому времени) в котлах (Исход 16:3), называя своих спасителей мучителями.

                     Другая архетипическая структура Торы.

            Пророк и отец, настоящий создатель евреев как народа, Моисей,  после получения заповедей - "не убий" и т.п. - непосредственно от Бога (так по Торе), орал на евреев, тогда на весь народ.

  -  «вы зачем оставили в живых детей», повторю цитату из Торы -

«и сказал им Моисей: для чего вы оставили в живых всех женщин? <…> Убейте всех детей мужского пола и всех женщин, познавших мужа на мужском ложе, убейте; а всех детей женского пола, которые не познали мужеского ложа, оставьте в живых для себя» (Чис. 31:15–18)

               Но после появляется  и  Сам Бог евреев. И как он реагирует на подобное? Да просто не замечает, и занимается…  бухгалтерией на крови детей!!!

«25. И сказал Господь Моисею, говоря:

26. сочти добычу плена, от человека до скота»

 (Книга Числа 31:25-27)

 

            «Евреи принадлежат к темной и отталкивающей силе. Кто знает, как многочисленна эта клика, как они держатся вместе и какую мощь они могут проявлять благодаря своей спаянности.» (Марк Туллий Цицерон /106-43 гг. до н.э./ философ, римский политический деятель, оратор)

            Со времён Цицерона прошло 2000 лет, и вот  в  конце 19 века Э. Золя в статье «В защиту евреев» (sic) пишет:

            «Изложу по пунктам обвинения, предъявляемые евреям. Их обвиняют в том, что они представляют собой национальность, вкрапленную в недра других национальностей, что они живут замкнутой жизнью религиозной касты, что для них не существует границ и они являются своего рода интернациональной сектой, не имеют настоящей родины и, если когда-нибудь восторжествуют, способны подчинять себе весь мир.» (Более жёстко Э.Золя выразил то же самое в антисемитской тираде одного из своего персонажей романа «Финансист»).

            И далее подводит итог:  «Все это правда.»

            Но сразу как бы оправдывается:

            «Но, констатируя этот факт, мы должны его объяснить. Надо добавить, что евреи стали такими, каковы они теперь, в результате идиотских преследований, длившихся целых восемнадцать веков, — мы сами создали этот тип людей.»

            Но Цицерон и Сенека (тоже «антисемит») говорят как раз об обратном – они были до этих 18 веков.

       Вряд ли был мировой тысячелетний сговор народов  Земли, разных рас, культур, религий, эпох, чтобы совместно и целеустремлённо «создавать этот тип людей».

            Должно быть некое ядро в самих евреях, что способствовало такому «сговору» народов и рас.

            И это ядро архетипы Торы, воспроизводимые столетиями раввинатом, талмудистами всех категорий, и самим  образом еврейской жизни среди этих народов.

 

           Итак, читаем Тору, Исход (Шмот) глава 34, а это не простые слова, а повеление Бога всему народу евреев на все времена.

 "1. И сказал Господь Моисею: вытеши себе две скрижали каменные, подобные прежним, и Я напишу на сих скрижалях слова, какие были на прежних скрижалях, которые ты разбил;

 10 И сказал Господь: вот, Я заключаю завет: пред всем народом твоим соделаю чудеса, каких не было по всей земле и ни у каких народов;.......

12 смотри, не вступай в союз с жителями той земли, в которую ты войдешь, дабы они не сделались сетью среди вас.

13 Жертвенники их разрушьте, столбы их сокрушите, вырубите священные рощи их.

 14 ибо ты не должен поклоняться богу иному, кроме Господа; потому что имя Его - ревнитель; Он Бог ревнитель......

 27 И сказал Господь Моисею: напиши себе слова сии, ибо в сих словах Я заключаю завет с тобою и с Израилем.

28 И пробыл там Моисей у Господа сорок дней и сорок ночей, хлеба не ел и воды не пил; и написал на скрижалях слова завета, десятословие."

             Вот он настоящий их декалог (написанный на вторых скрижалях, а не тот первый , скрижали которого Моисей разбил), а не "не убий" и т.п. не убий своего, а с чужим, что церемонится - разрушай и сокрушай их столбы и священные рощи

             Евреи оправдывают это тем, что те народы поклонялись идолам, например, Молоху.

            Но и во время завоевания Ханаана и многие века после завоевания евреи сами занимались этим, что отражено ими  самими в Танахе.

  «устроили капища Ваалу в долине сыновей Енномовых, чтобы проводить через огонь сыновей своих и дочерей своих в честь Молоху» (Иер. 32, 35)

 «осквернил Тофет, что на долине сыновей Еннома, чтобы никто не проводил сына своего и дочери своей чрез огонь Молоху» (4 Цар. 23, 10) 

 «Тогда построил Соломон капище Хамосу, мерзости Моавитской, на горе, которая пред Иерусалимом, и Молоху, мерзости Аммонитской» (3 Цар. 11, 7) 

 «21. Из детей твоих не отдавай на служение Молоху и не бесчести имени Бога твоего. Я Господь». (Книга Левит 18:21)


    Скрытое презрение к другим выражается в языке евреев (отражении, сформированного тысячелетиями, их коллективного бессознательного), в том, как евреи относятся к иным, к гоям. Как говорят сами евреи «гои» – это просто иные, без всякой враждебной коннотации, утверждая, что в этом нет ничего плохого.

    Но посмотрим, как они именуют жён и матерей этих иных - шикса (мерзость и гадина).

    "Происходит от шиксэ (от ивритского שקץ «шэкэц» — «мерзость, гад» или «нечистое насекомое») — слова на идише, означающего нееврейку и/или гойку, или недостаточно ортодоксальную еврейку, например, по нормам поведения."

    Это они так наших жён, матерей и сестёр именуют (гадины, насекомые), это отражено в их языке.

    А язык, повторюсь ещё раз, это выражение коллективного бессознательного, лексику которого не спрячешь за пустой болтовнёй о толерантности всегда безвинно страдающего еврейского народа.




четверг, 1 февраля 2024 г.

Understanding the Holy Trinity

 Surin S.Yu.

Understanding the Holy Trinity

 

I.  The Trinity.

 Immediately, God the Father is not "equal" for us (a Christian will not say so - "equal" means that there is, or may be, someone the same, but different, and this is not Christianity) to the human in time Jesus - the Son of God.

"Father and Son" is not a generic or causal relationship, but a logical-structural one expressed in mythological image.

He is one with Him in structure, and as the living structure, of all existing in general and in Eternity and in the world, but not one and the same. "One" and "same" are quantitative characteristics, but God cannot be counted even once, He is timeless. That is why Jesus prayed here and now (then and there), as a man, to Himself, who is outside of time, for whom there is no here and now (then and there).

If someone is confused about how a small part of the whole is "equal" (corresponds unambiguously) to the whole, let him remember from mathematics the concept of infinite sets, where, for example, the set of numbers divisible by 1000 (1000, 2000, .....) is equal to (corresponds unambiguously to) the whole original set of natural numbers (1,2,3.... 1000, 1001...). And this thinned set from itself can easily restore the whole original one, just by crossing out three zero symbols on the right side.

 So for the infinite (God) this is not only common, but necessary.

If the multitude has no such correspondence with its part, the multitude is not infinite (R. Dedekind) - God is no longer God, but an idol.

 He is one with Him as Himself, beyond time and space in Eternity, just as our Self and its realisation of itself by this Self are one, one without the other is simply inconceivable, there is no such way of thinking - this is His image and likeness in us.

 Let us begin with the first words of the very first message, or supposedly the very first message, or one of the first intuitions of the sense of God (Allah, Elohim) expressed and recorded by humans, with the Toledot of the Torah.

 "In the beginning created the Gods (אֱלֹהִים is plural in Hebrew) the heavens and the earth." (Genesis 1:1)

"and the Spirit of God was upon the water." (Genesis 1:2)

"And Gods ( אֱלֹהִים) said, Let there be light" (Genesis 1:3) To whom did he say ? - Himself as Son.

 

"And God said, Let Us make man in Our image after Our likeness..." (Genesis 1:26)"

 God and to Our (not mine), and to whom did he say it if he is One in the beginning?

  So much for the Trinity.

 This is the structure of the reflection of our self-consciousness as something unified in its being.

It is reflected, willingly or unwillingly, not only in the Toledot of the Torah, but also in the Hindus - Trimurti, in the Koran (Quran) - Allah, Mother of the Book, Spirit (Q 17: 85), in the theologies and cosmogonies of the Greeks - chaos, kosmos, theos. Everywhere one tries more or less deeply to comprehend what existence is in general.

 To be realised as one (tawhid), God or man - which is in us that which is created in the image and likeness of God - one must:

 1)        to experience it as the beginning of existence (God is the Father), that "I am"

 2)        that the realisation (reflexion in the Logos, in the word) of this "beginning" has a direct relation to my Self, to my realisation of "I am" (God the Son), and

 3)        and that the realisation of this unity ( the beginning and the Self) is Their binding action (Being) inseparable from them ( God the Holy Spirit).

 

So when you speak of One God (Tawhid for Muslims and unity for Jews) you implicitly imply this triune structure (the Blessed Trinity) of the existence of anything at all.

 Without which, structure, no conscious existence is possible.

 Unity is not a quantitative characteristic of God (God cannot be counted even once - He is outside of time and space), as with Muslims and Jews.

The unity of God is the "here and now" created unity of the realisation of the Being of whatever is identical with it (Him).

 The God of the Koran (Quran), as well as the God of the Jews, the God of the Torah, without revealing the meaning of this structure, becomes the Supreme and Almighty cognitive IDOL, the dead word of the Talmud of the Jews and the endless tafsirs of the Muslims.

Without which the Koran and Torah cannot be a consistent monotheism. People are not the image and likeness of God for them.

 The God of Christians in Trinity lives with people, suffers, dies and is resurrected. And all this in earnest, to the blood sweat of Christ. This is the meaning of creating man in the image and likeness of God.

 Allah of the Muslims, like the Elohim of the Jews, commands, admonishes, threatens, bullies and tricks people and is jealous of them (God is jealous with the Jews).

The Almighty, who is cunning (Q 3:47), who mocks and schemes (Q 2:15), who is jealous (Ex 34:14) to the point of hysteria and total annihilation (Deuteronomy 6:15), who is concerned with sanitation (Numbers 5:2-3), is He not IDOL!!!! (O you who read the Quran and the Torah, do you have reason and conscience?!!!).

 Here, "image and likeness" are superfluous to the Creator's toys.

 Therefore, the teaching of Christians is not the teaching of Christ, Jesus Christ did not write books and did not dictate, but the work of his disciples, our teaching about Christ according to the Gospels and the letters of the Apostles. Our will and our responsibility.

 We are creators in His image and likeness.

 The teaching of Muslims is a dumb muttering of the Koran, accepting any nonsense written in it, such as that the Trinity of Christians is Father, Son and ..... Virgin Mary (Q 5:116), that Ezra in Jews is the Son of God (Q 9:30). Jews have a similar thing in the Talmud and Kabbalah.

 Muslims are not human beings "in the image" but passive (Islam literally submission) playthings of God. Jews are "chosen" according to the Torah, but they too are toys.

 This is not monotheism , it is idolatry of One single Idol in the world.

 

II. The atoning  sacrifice of Christ.

 

It refers to the possibility of eternal life, not only for us, but for God Himself.

The sacrifice is based on the internal contradiction of God and Nothing in Eternity, not in time, as forcing God into His own existence.

Explanation. One can only understand, or outline an understanding of, this in purely logical structures.

 "Why does something exist at all, and is not Nothing?" (M. Heidegger).

Yes, because Nothing is impossible in its content. If it is realised, it is no longer Nothing, but Nothing (even as emptiness, which is not Nothing). This Nothingness the Greeks intuitively called Chaos.

 God exists because He cannot not exist (His limitation in the Nothing). He is organic to His death in the impossibility of Nothingness. It is a compulsion to exist.

To overcome this limitation and to be realised as the Absolute, God as the Almighty must die as man, to realise his Nothingness in time, otherwise there is no other way.

For this purpose we are created (in time and space) as His image and likeness - in the structure of our self-image as existing.

 To sacrifice ourselves - to overcome our limitation (this is the essence of Jesus' prayer to God and His entire temporal life) in the impossibility of Absolute Nothingness, becoming Absolute Life.

The solution to this will be the Resurrection and Eternal Life without this God-limiting contradiction with Nothing no longer in time, but in Eternity.

 We will be saved because God will also live eternally without contradiction with Nothing in Eternity.

Our salvation is more about God than about ourselves, though that is a shame.

 

III. Who died on the cross (in the form of a discussion).

     "So who died on the cross-the father, the son, the holy spirit, or did all three die ?"

 None of them and all together, since in Eternity death is impossible for God without Resurrection (Absolute Nothing is impossible), - "father, son, spirit (life)" are not generic concepts, but logical-structural relations of reflection of the existence of anything at all.

 God cannot not exist, for Him there is no death without resurrection.

 The sacrifice is to become human and die (but not "where and when" - which is meaningless to God).

 "When and where" are meaningless to God who is beginningless and timeless.

 If you think otherwise, you are not thinking of God, but of an imaginary idol.

  Don't confuse the death of the eternal God (Jesus) with the death of the Pre-Eternal, with the reconciliation of God the Son of the Pre-Eternal with Nothingness (this is the death and resurrection in the Eternity of God, the former is impossible without the latter), which does not allow him to "not be".

  Jesus' death in time and space, reconciliation with Nothing outside of them.

 "Could God have created sinless Adam to never sin?"

 He could not, for this is not about man, but about God - His impossibility of "not being." He does not need such a man (world, universe) without metaphysical error (sin). He is no longer the image and likeness of God in His contradiction with Nothing (for us the contradiction of Life and Death). In him, God cannot be reconciled with His Nothingness.

 "And what changed after Christ's death? "

 In this world, nothing.

 Outside of time, in Eternity (it's not very long, it has nothing to do with duration at all) there was the possibility of Life without the contradiction of Death (Nothingness), and thus for us the chance to live forever.

  "All your answers are not from Jesus!"

  Jesus did not write books (God does not need books and laws, but ACTIONS-LIFE), all His words spoken by Him have been handed down to us through other people (Evangelists), who, as Luke (1:3) called his work a study, i.e. also wrote from himself, like me .

 

IV. Why have the Jews not accepted the Son of God?

 The reason why the Jews do not accept the Son of God is that they themselves worship an imaginary idol of Yahweh, not made of clay, but of quotations from the Torah and the Talmud, for which the relationship "Father and Son" has a generic or causal character.

And for the Eternal God time does not exist, there is no "before and after" in eternity.

Therefore, for Him, the relationship "Father and Son" has a logical-structural character of reflection of the consciousness of something existing. It is that which is in us in the image and likeness of God.

 The Sons of God in the Torah in relation to human beings is a generic relation, the Son of God in relation to Jesus is a structural-logical relation of reflection of our existence.

 This is a LIVING STRUCTURE, it cannot be adequately described in words without its realisation in them, by ourselves.

 That is, it cannot be described without its demonstration (realisation) in words - to realise it in our own life, in our own being, the realisation of the interpretation of this structure.

Hence this living structure and form.

Try to explain what is "meaning and sense" without words demonstrating both meanings and senses. It won't work.

 That is why our God is the only living God, most simply revealed to us in the Most Holy Trinity, always living in us and through us.

And all the other Yahwehs, Allahs and the like have long since become cognitive artefacts - idols. And if you are all children of God in the generic causal sense of the Torah, then your God is an IDOL!!!!.